Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
back
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History


Jeremy Putman wrote:

Hi guys,

  • Can you receive Holy Communion if you struggle with the teachings of papal infallibility and the Assumption of Mary?
  • If not, how does someone like Hans Kung remain a priest?

Jeremy

  { Can you receive Holy Communion if you don't understand papal Infallibility and the Assumption? }

John replied:

Hi Jeremy,

There is a distinct difference between struggling with a doctrine and the obstinate post-baptismal denial of doctrine.

In the first instance, if one is humble and is at least willing to admit that Holy Mother Church knows best, then one does not find themselves in formal heresy.

On the other hand, when someone insists on denying a truth which the Church teaches, and remains unteachable, then one is clearly in formal heresy and should refrain from receiving the Eucharist.

That said, if someone is denying papal infallibility, as defined by the Church, then one obviously denies the authority of the Church, so I doubt that person would respect the admonition to voluntarily abstain from Communion.

Hope this helps,

John

Mary Ann replied:

Hi Jeremy,

Struggling with doctrines does not mean having a lack of faith. Doubts do not equal having a lack of faith. Struggling with doctrines is also not the same as publicly disagreeing with them.

In today's world, when people say struggle with they often really mean fight against. It used to mean wrestling with yourself and with God in faith, not struggling against the Church in disagreement.

I think that some priests who deny basic doctrines remain priests for several reasons.

  1. First, the Vatican always wants to be very sure that they know the true position of the person before excommunicating or warning them, and that takes a long time.
  2. Second, the theologians in question can say one thing to the Vatican and another thing to the world.
  3. Third, a priest might want to stay a priest even if he doesn't believe, because it is the world that he knows and his means of livelihood.

Hope this helps,

Mary Ann

Mike replied:

Hi Jeremy,

I wanted to add on to Mary Ann's comments.

You said:

  • If not, how does someone like Hans Kung remain a priest?

Of the seven sacraments of the Church, three of them stamp a indelible character on the soul of the recipient: Baptism, Confirmation and Holy Orders.

  • Baptism marks the recipient with a character that makes them a new creation in Jesus, Our Lord and part of His Mystical Body, the Church.
  • Confirmation marks the recipient with a character to stand up for the faith in the public square and to go and preach the Good News as commanded in Matthew 28.
  • Holy Orders marks a man with a very special character that conforms his body, mind and soul to Christ. This very special character allows Jesus to act in the priest and administer the sacraments of the Church.
  • Why is this important?

Once a priest is ordained a priest, he is a priest forever. When he passes from this earthly life, he will either be a priest in Heaven or a priest in Hell, based on the choices he has made in his life.

You may be asking:

  • What about the laicizing of a priest to a lay state like I have heard on the news?

This means he can no long serve publicly as a priest. Nevertheless, he is still a priest.

Hope this helps,

Mike

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.