Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
back
Church Internals
Church History

Jeff Martin wrote:

Hi, guys —

  • Can a Catholic defend with deadly force

      (a) his/her home from intrusion or theft?
      (b) his/her children or spouse from harm by others?

There are stories of monks in the desert and elsewhere who allowed thieves to ransack their hermitages. That is, they did not defend or fight for their "property."

  • If someone breaks into my home, should I not resist with force the intrusion?
  • If someone is in a position to harm my spouse or child, should I not attack that person with deadly force to stop them?

Thanks.

Jeff
  { Can a Catholic defend with deadly force (his/her) home from intrusion or theft or (his/her) children or spouse from harm? }

Eric replied:

Jeff,
Yes, a Catholic may defend himself with lethal force.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church, the church's flagship teaching guide, says as much:

Legitimate defense.

2263 The legitimate defense of persons and societies is not an exception to the prohibition against the murder of the innocent that constitutes intentional killing.

"The act of self-defense can have a double effect:

  1. the preservation of one's own life; and
  2. the killing of the aggressor. . . .

    The one is intended, the other is not."

(St. Thomas Aquinas, STh II-II, 64, 7, corp. art.)

2264 Love toward oneself remains a fundamental principle of morality. Therefore it is legitimate to insist on respect for one's own right to life. Someone who defends his life is not guilty of murder even if he is forced to deal his aggressor a lethal blow:

If a man in self-defense uses more than necessary violence, it will be unlawful: whereas if he repels force with moderation, his defense will be lawful. . . . Nor is it necessary for salvation that a man omit the act of moderate self-defense to avoid killing the other man, since one is bound to take more care of one's own life than of another's.

(St. Thomas Aquinas, STh II-II, 64, 7, corp. art.)

2265 Legitimate defense can be not only a right but a grave duty for one who is responsible for the lives of others. The defense of the common good requires that an unjust aggressor be rendered unable to cause harm. For this reason, those who legitimately hold authority also have the right to use arms to repel aggressors against the civil community entrusted to their responsibility.

Hope this helps,

Eric

Jeff replied:

Jeff replied:

Thanks very much. 

Jeff Martin

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.