Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
back
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History


Robert Jackson wrote:

Hi, guys —

I believe the teachings of the Catholic Church. I know that in Hebrew or Aramaic there was no word for cousin in the time of Jesus and therefore close relatives were called brothers or sisters.

Nevertheless, I have Baptist friends that read the King James Bible, and it does use the word cousin.

I can only guess at why and would like a more correct answer.

Thank you for your help.

Robert

  { Why does the King James Bible use 'cousin' when there was no such word in Hebrew or Aramaic? }

John replied:

Hi, Robert —

Thank you for your question.

The fact that the King James translates the Greek texts brother is not relevant. That is the choice of the translator.

The Greek word used is Adelphos. It means brothers but in the Hebrew culture, it was common to call a close relative of any kind, a brother. From Genesis, we know that Lot was Abraham's nephew, yet in some texts he is called Abraham's brother. (Genesis 14:12-16 and Genesis 29:10-15)

All that said, the Church does not dogmatically teach that the brothers were cousins. It simply says that they were relatives and not other children born to Mary.

In the West, the Church developed a small t tradition that they were cousins, whereas in the East, the tradition is that these siblings were children of Joseph by a prior marriage.

Nobody before the Reformation believed that Mary had other children or that she did not remain a virgin her entire life. It is as much a part of the Eastern Orthodox faith as it is the Catholic faith.

Even Martin Luther maintained this belief. It was only later, as Protestants continued to drift further and further away that they dropped this belief.

John

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.