|
 |
David
wrote:
|
Hi, guys —
I am a Catholic who was raised and confirmed in
my mid-thirties. I am also a lawyer. As a
lawyer,
I was reading the four Gospels for the first
time, from beginning to end, when to my surprise,
I found the following passage at Mark 13:26-30 (Douay-Rheims translation):
26 And
then shall they see the Son of man coming
in the clouds, with great power and glory. 27 And
then shall he send his angels, and shall
gather together his elect from the four
winds, from the uttermost part of the earth
to the uttermost part of heaven. 28 Now
of the fig tree learn ye a parable. When
the branch thereof is now tender, and the
leaves are come forth, you know that summer
is very near. 29 So you also when you shall see
these things come to pass, know ye that
it is very nigh, even at the doors. 30 Amen
I say to you, that this generation shall
not pass, until all these things be done.
Mark 13:26-30 |
There are also, as you would be aware, other
passages in Mark 8:38-39 and Matthew 16:27-28 (and in Luke); the straightforward and reasonable
interpretation of which Jesus predicted that
the Second Coming would happen within a generation
from when He was living on Earth.
I acknowledge that Jesus does state in other
passages that only God, the Father knows the
exact day, however, Jesus does quite clearly
state the outer time limit — a limit
that has been exceeded twenty fold in the
subsequent two millennia.
As far as I am aware, this prediction by Jesus
about the Second Coming in the Gospels is
unique, in that it is the only aspect of the
Gospels that is independently verifiable by
a person living today. A person reading that
prediction doesn't have to rely on the observations
or stories of others. One simply reads
the prediction and assesses what did or didn't happen.
This leads to quite an issue. As I understand
Catholic doctrine, Jesus is the Son of God
and the Gospels are the Word of God — the
authors being inspired by the Holy Spirit.
The Son of God obviously doesn't make mistakes (nor do the Gospels).
If the person, Jesus,
can reasonably be shown to have made a mistake
in the Gospels (i.e. on any reasonable
reading He gets the date of the Second Coming
wrong by a large margin, getting larger by
the day), then He wasn't the Son of God
and therefore everything, in terms of belief,
falls apart.
I'm sure I'm not the first to make the above observations.
- How does the Catholic Church approach
this issue?
David
|
{
If
Jesus was wrong on when the Second Coming
would occur, how can we trust His Teachings? }
|
John
replied:
Hi, David —
Thanks for the question.
To understand these texts we have
to understand the idioms of the time.
Yes, this refers to the Second and
Final Coming of the Lord, but there
is a play on words as well. The idea
of a Second Coming is a military
notion of that day. A general would
conquer a city and establish a rule
of law. He would then leave and go
off to fight other campaigns with
the promise that He would return
and execute a judgment on the city
if it had, or had not, complied with
the rule he had established. So the second
coming or Parousia,
in the Greek, is linked to judgment.
The word generation means a generation
as we understand it or it can also
mean a certain age. For instance, Paul writes in Romans about the day
of the Gentile or age
of the gentile and he goes
on to talk about Israel remaining
blind to the Gospel until the day
of the gentile had been fulfilled.
In other words, we were entering
an era in which the non-Jews were
going to come to Christ as the Gospel
was being preached throughout the
world, but there would come a day
when that age would come to a close
and, once again, Israel would be
front and center in God's plan of
Salvation.
So returning to the Gospels; we are
dealing with prophecy, which often
times is layered and has multiple
fulfillments. In a sense, there was
a second
coming or a
judgment which came upon that literal
generation (40 years). In 70 A.D.
Jerusalem and the Temple were destroyed.
Pretty much, from that day forward,
the Church no longer considered Herself
part of Israel.
The Christian Jews refused to fight
along side their brothers to protect
Jerusalem from the Romans. The Jews (meaning the established hierarchy) had been persecuting the Jewish believers
in the Messiah, so the infant Church
was separated from Her nurse, Mother
Israel.
If you read the history of the day
written by the Roman Historian, Taticus, you
will read some pretty bizarre tales
of armies being seen fighting in
the sky and all kinds of manifestations
as Jerusalem was destroyed.
So here we have a first fulfillment
of this Parousia or Judgment.
A thorough study of Revelation will
also bring you to the same conclusion.
Much has already been fulfilled once,
in and around, 70 A.D.
Now, that doesn't mean we have seen
all we will see. Clearly, we are
still waiting for the Lord to return.
We are closer to that day than ever
before and, of course, tomorrow we
will be closer.
That said, this is not an either-or situation. Generation means both age and
a literal generation.
We've
seen one; we await the other.
John
|
|
|
|