Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
back
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History


Gary Egmon wrote:

Hi, guys —

Matthew 16 is cited as the authority for the papacy and the primacy of Peter.

Mark 8 contains a similar story with Peter answering Jesus but Our Lord makes no reference to Peter's authority. Some say Mark is the older and more accurate account.

  • What does the Church say about this?

Gary

  { From the Church's view, which is the older and more accurate account: Matthew 16 or Mark 8? }

Mike replied:

Hi, Gary —

Thanks for the question.

I believe Mark's Gospel was the older manuscript. Nevertheless, the age of both Gospels is totally irrelevant to the issue you have addressed as both Matthew and Mark's Gospel are the inspired Word of God.

Any Protestant with a mind set that would strive to disprove the papacy and the primacy of Peter because Matthew's Gospel is not the older manuscript, would be denying their own Scriptures, which includes Matthew's Gospel, as the Word of God. Read 2 Peter 1:20.

20 First of all you must understand this, that no prophecy of scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation, 21 because no prophecy ever came by the impulse of man, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God. (2 Peter 1:20-21)

This is why Catholic Christians are blessed to have a living Magisterium, meaning teaching authority, when at times, a proper interpretation is needed: one, we believe, is guided by the Holy Spirit.

There is no reason to doubt the accuracy of either Gospel when understood correctly.

The senses of Scripture

115 According to an ancient tradition, one can distinguish between two senses of Scripture: the literal and the spiritual, the latter being subdivided into the allegorical, moral and anagogical senses. The profound concordance of the four senses guarantees all its richness to the living reading of Scripture in the Church.

116 The literal sense is the meaning conveyed by the words of Scripture and discovered by exegesis, following the rules of sound interpretation:

All other senses of Sacred Scripture are based on the literal.

(St. Thomas Aquinas, STh I, 1, 10, ad I)

117 The spiritual sense. Thanks to the unity of God's plan, not only the text of Scripture but also the realities and events about which it speaks can be signs.

1. The allegorical sense. We can acquire a more profound understanding of events by recognizing their significance in Christ; thus the crossing of the Red Sea is a sign or type of Christ's victory and also of Christian Baptism. (cf. 1 Corinthians 10:2)

2. The moral sense. The events reported in Scripture ought to lead us to act justly. As St. Paul says, they were written for our instruction. (1 Corinthians 10:11; cf. Hebrews 3:1-4:11)

3. The anagogical sense (Greek: anagoge, "leading"). We can view realities and events in terms of their eternal significance, leading us toward our true homeland: thus the Church on earth is a sign of the heavenly Jerusalem. (cf. Revelation 21:1-22:5)

118 A medieval couplet summarizes the significance of the four senses:

The Letter speaks of deeds; Allegory to faith;

The Moral how to act; Anagogy our destiny.
(Lettera gesta docet, quid credas allegoria, moralis quid agas, quo tendas anagogia; Augustine of Dacia, Rotulus pugillaris, I: ed. A. Walz: Angelicum 6 (1929) 256)

119 "It is the task of exegetes to work, according to these rules, towards a better understanding and explanation of the meaning of Sacred Scripture in order that their research may help the Church to form a firmer judgment. For, of course, all that has been said about the manner of interpreting Scripture is ultimately subject to the judgment of the Church which exercises the divinely conferred commission and ministry of watching over and interpreting the Word of God." (Dogmatic Constitution On Divine Revelation 12 § 3)

But I would not believe in the Gospel, had not the authority of the Catholic Church already moved me.

(St. Augustine, Contra epistolam Manichaei, 5,6:PL 42,176)



Mike

Paul replied:

Dear Gary —

Consensus among Bible scholars is that Mark is the older gospel but the real question is:

  • Which is older, the Gospels or the Holy Spirit?

It's the Holy Spirit that Christ sent who inspires both of these Gospels as well as the Magisterium of the Church which authoritatively interprets the Word of God in both books.

Paul

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.