Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
back
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History


John Doe wrote:

Hi, guys —

What is a person's evidence for the existence in God?

John

  { What is a person's evidence for the existence in God? }

Mary Ann replied:

Hi, John —

  1. the person
  2. the question
  3. existence
  4. the concept of such a thing as evidence

I am being facile, but if you think about these things long enough, you will stumble upon,
by yourself, the best way!, the age long arguments for the existence of God.

The only one missing is beauty, which would be you.

Mary Ann

John replied:

Mary Ann,

  • Could you please refer my question to somebody capable of giving a coherent response?

John

Mary Ann replied:

John —

The evidence for the existence of God is first, the subjective experience of the questioner, who knows his own spiritual nature.

Then there is the personal character of the questioner, who seeks personal fulfillment in an infinite way.

Then there is the evidence of the design and intelligibility of the universe.

The questioner obviously believes that there is such a thing as truth, understanding of truth, and evidence-based true knowledge. There can be none of these if there is no God.

There is the fact of the existence and motion of the universe.

Finally, there is beauty and our wonder at beauty. Beauty is termed the radiance of being or the radiance of truth. Absolute and personal Truth, beauty, being, and love.

These are what we call God.

Mary Ann

John replied:

Mary Ann,

You seem to be saying the beauty of things is your evidence and a person's subjective experience is also evidence.

  • Do you believe your definition of evidence can be mistaken or faulty in any way?

John

Mary Ann replied:

John,

You asked for evidence, not for evidence from physical science. There are degrees of evidence and kinds of evidence. The fact that I think, will, and sense a disjuncture between my mortality and my essence is evidence that my soul is immortal.

Truth and beauty are evidence for God. The problem now is not that people don't accept this.
The problem now is that people don't believe there is such a thing as truth or beauty!

Yet the same people will still contradict themselves by believing physical science, and in the fact that reality exists . . . though that is changing also, as the reality-itself-is-illusion idea takes hold, or as science is made to serve political agendas.

As for beauty, C.S. Lewis has a good take on that in the Abolition of Man, which I would recommend.

Mary Ann

John replied:

Mary Ann,

First of all, thank you for your responses but let's see if you can actually answer my question this time. It's simple:

  • Do you believe that a person's evidence can be mistaken or faulty in any way?

John

Mary Ann replied:


That was not the question you asked at first. A person can be mistaken in his logic, and even in his perception (hallucinations, for example). Evidence, itself, is just data, from which one reasons. I believe that our senses do apprehend reality. The data for the existence of God are:

  1. Creation and
  2. The self-revelation of God.

There is also historical evidence that surrounds it, and renders it probable, but which does not bring about faith.

For example, the statement that Christ is divine is not derivable by reason because He has to reveal it. There are signs and evidences that He is divine. One of the famous arguments by
C. S. Lewis is that Christ is either:

  • a liar
  • a lunatic
  • or God

We know he is not the first nor the second, by all human measures.  We know that the Apostles paid with their lives for their testimony in the Resurrection. Our faith stands or falls on the trustworthiness of their testimony so if one is examining the Christian faith, one should, besides asking God for help, carefully study that issue.

Mary Ann

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.