Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
back
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History

Anonymous Gabriel wrote:

Hi, guys —

I have a questions for you. There are two types of people:

  1. Some who think a situation, where people consent, is wrong (that is a grave matter, when in fact it's not) and
  2. others who are similarly scrupulous, like the first, and confuse a situation to be mortally sinful because of their scrupulosity; they also consent because they are annoyed (because they must rationalize in their mind that the matter is not sinful) and, theoretically, they are not so guilty for their sin because their confusion is due to their illness.

Example in case you don't understand.

  1. The (1) first person: He's not scrupulous and he erroneously thinks that a situation is a grave matter but in a normal way and he consents because he thinks it's OK, even if it is, in fact, wrong and results in mortal sin.
  2. The (2) second person: He is scrupulous and he also erroneously thinks a circumstance is a grave matter but his thinking is affected by his disease and he consents because he is annoyed (because he must fight with his scrupulosity). He also consents, but again he must rationalize in his mind that the matter is not sinful.

Now the question is:

  • How can I distinguish one case from the other case in my own behavior?

Gabriel

  { How I can discern between two people: one who's scrupulous with an illness, and one who's not? }

Mike replied:

Dear Gabriel,

You said:
Now the question is:

  • How can I distinguish one case from the other case in my own behavior?
  • Why do you need to distinguish between these two situations?

Unless you are a priest, there is no reason for you to distinguish between these situations.

We are not priests and do not have the background or training to assist in spiritual counseling.
We are only lay Catholics who defend the faith and give good reasons for non-Catholics to become Catholic.

Each individual is different and has an array of issues including:

  • health issues
  • psychological issues
  • mental issues
  • emotional issues
  • sexual issues,
  • and more.

One has to be very careful not to rationalize a mortal sin as a venial sin and one also has to be very careful not to overlook mental and psychological issues when counseling a faithful lay Catholic in dealing with a mortal sin.

If you know a Person 1 or Person 2 who struggles in this area, the best thing you can do is recommend a faithful pastor or priest who can provide some spiritual counseling. If you have problems finding one, contact the local diocese or archdiocese for help.

Instead of focusing on distinguishing between two situations, we should all focus on our own Particular Judgment, not the particular judgment of others.

I hope this helps,

Mike

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.