|
|
 |
UnbaptizedAndUnsure
wrote:
|
|
Hi, guys —
The 1917 Code of Canon Law has the Baptism
for the insane in ways I can clearly see as
being from Thomistic theology, whereas I can't
understand the 1983 Code of Canon Law.
- In its emphasis, is there any difference
in the 1983 Code of Canon Law from 1917
Code of Canon Law?
It mentions the lack of personal culpability
for certain people in regards to Baptism but
this may mean what the 1917 code meant by
those who have never had use of reason; I
don't know.
I have a mental illness and am non-baptized,
so I am curious to know what it means for
me in regards to Baptism.
- I do not know how to interpret it.
Thanks.
UnbaptizedAndUnsure
|
| {
Can you interpret the 1983 Code of Canon Law as it relates to Baptism
for the mentally ill/insane? }
|
|
Mary
Ann replied:
|
UnbaptizedAndUnsure,
The good thing is that you do not
need to know how to interpret it.
You can go to a priest and ask
for Baptism!
- Baptism must be a free choice
for an adult, but for a child,
the desire of the parents suffices.
- For little ones who die without
Baptism, the desire of the Church
and the parents can suffice.
For someone who is in extremis or
unconscious, Baptism can be administered
if there is a reason to believe the
person wanted it.
Mary Ann
|
Paul
replied:
|
UnbaptizedAndUnsure,
It seems to me that insane means
to be without reason.
Traditionally,
this has applied to children under
seven years old (that being the age
of reason), but maybe it could include
adults too, who do not have the use
of reason.
Most mental illness, of course, would
not fit this category but perhaps
the faith of a sponsor might be necessary
to effectively baptize a truly insane
adult.
I've never heard this before but
it might be a good idea to call your
diocesan office of worship to ask
this question.
Paul
|
|
|
|
