Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
back
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History


D.F. wrote:

Hi, guys —

  • Is it a sin if a man and woman who are not married, engage in foreplay but do not have intercourse?
  • Is it considered adultery?

D.F.

  { Is it adultery for an unwed man and woman to engage in foreplay, without further love-making? }

Paul replied:

Dear D.F.,

The moral principle for the unmarried couple is that no acts should be undertaken that, by their very nature, would incite, in either person, sexual arousal. This would include what is called petting, but also intimate hugging and kissing. Doing so freely and with knowledge is a sin.

This is logical because arousal is the body's way of preparing for intercourse, which is morally licit only within marriage. Physiologically, it is illogical to arouse without having any legitimate outlet. Anger and lust are the two vices that naturally demand a physiological release if harbored.

With anger it's violence (outward) or depression (inward), and for lust it is fornication or masturbation — all of which violate our human nature.

Our Lord seems to allude to this in the Sermon of the Mount, Matthew Chapter 5, when He condemns not only killing and adultery but also their internal forebearers of anger and lust. Remember, what arouses your boyfriend might be different from what arouses you, so an open and honest conversation between you on the difference between legitimate, friendly displays of affection versus sexually, arousing activity should be undertaken, with a plan to ensure that
Our Lord will be pleased and not offended.

I know, as well as you, that this is counter cultural today as well as very personally challenging but it's absolutely necessary for:

  • a healthy spiritual
  • hence healthy physical life
  • for self-esteem, and
  • for a right relationship with God.

Remember, if ever you fall out of weakness, Jesus awaits you in the sacrament of Confession.

Peace,

Paul

Mike replied:

Dear Donna,

Thanks for the question.

As my colleague Paul has stated, any act, outside marriage, between two unwed couples that leads up to the conjugal embrace would be considered sinful. This would include those who plan on getting married, along with those who have no intention of getting married.

Your question appears to address those who have known each other for a while.

Paul stated in his first paragraph:
The moral principle for the unmarried couple is that no acts should be undertaken that, by their very nature, would incite, in either person, sexual arousal. This would include what is called petting, but also intimate hugging and kissing. Doing so freely and with knowledge is a sin.

Within the context of a man and woman who are dating each other, I would be a little less strict than Paul.

I have never heard of any couple, who have dated for any period of time, who have not petted, kissed, or hugged during the courtship process . . . sometimes intensely. We are human and there is, to a limited extent, a getting to know you process.

The couple that prays together, during the courtship process, will be able to bring up, as Paul said, issues in an open and honest manner that address the differences between legitimate, friendly displays of affection versus sexually, arousing activity.

Mike

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.