Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History

Fred Iervolino wrote:

Hi, guys —

The Early Church Fathers believed in a millennial reign of Christ when He returns — before Final Judgement.

  • What is the official position of the Catholic Church on this topic?

Fred Iervolino

  { What is the Church's view of a millennial reign of Christ when He returns, before the Final Judgment? }

Eric replied:


This was not a universal belief among the Early Fathers; only some of them believed this. This view was later condemned, mostly because it began to acquire a lot of overtones of material excess (Chiliasm). The official position of the Catholic Church is that we are in the millennial reign of Christ now, and that it will end with the Second Coming.

Millenarianism was formally rejected in 1944:

D 2296 [DS 3839] In recent times on several occasions this Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office has been asked what must be thought of the system of mitigated Millenarianism, which teaches, for example, that Christ the Lord before the final judgment, whether or not preceded by the Resurrection of the many just, will come visibly to rule over this world. The answer is: The system of mitigated Millenarianism cannot be taught safely.

Another resource has this to say:

Heretical Chiliasm stands condemned in the light of the moral law, which excludes intemperance and unchastity from the kingdom of Heaven. 5 It is blasphemous and an insult to God to assert that Christ, who is all-holy, will found an Earthly paradise for libertines. No wonder even those Fathers and ecclesiastical writers who entertained Chiliastic ideas vigorously condemned this grossly sensual species of Millenarianism as heretical.

It is not so easy to refute the more moderate form of Chiliasm, for it seems to have a basis in Sacred Scripture and primitive Tradition.

The New Testament as well as the early creeds speak of the Resurrection of the flesh, the Last Judgment, and the end of the world in terms which make it apparent that these three events are to follow one another in close succession, 6 leaving no time for a millennium.

[...] Despite appearances to the contrary, Chiliasm has no foundation in Tradition. Among its early advocates Lactantius, Nepos, Commodian, and Victorinus may, in the light of the Decretum Gelasianum, be set aside as worthless witnesses. 8 The same could be said of Sulpicius Severus if he were to be reckoned among the Chiliasts, which is, however, extremely doubtful, as his extant writings contain no trace of this error.

Of the remaining writers who are quoted in favor of Chiliasm we may disregard Papias because he was uncritical, 9 and Tertullian because he was a heretic when he embraced Millenarianism. 10 St. Justin Martyr 11 and St. Irenaeus, 12 the only two remaining witnesses who are absolutely trustworthy, did not inculcate Chiliasm as an article of faith, but merely proposed it as a personal opinion. Whether St. Melito, Bishop of Sardes, harbored Millenarian notions, is uncertain. 13 St. Hippolytus, who is numbered among the Chiliasts by Bonwetsch, 14 has not written a single line, in the works that have come down to us, which must necessarily be interpreted in a Chiliastic sense. 15 Bonwetsch himself 16 is constrained to admit that Hippolytus discarded some of the eschatological notions held by Irenaeus and Tertullian.
(Eschatology, or the Catholic Doctrine of the Last Things: A Dogmatic Treatise by Arthur Preuss and Joseph Pohle)

And a final resource has this to say:

Christian interpretation of the thousand-year reign of the martyrs and other faithful with Christ, also called the †millennium, has been quite diverse. 8 Some early and highly respected Christian teachers, including Papias (d. 135), Justin Martyr (d. 165), Irenaeus (d. 202), Tertullian (d. ca. 220), and Victorinus (d. 303), expected a literal thousand-year period of an earthly paradise when Christ and the saints would rule the nations and biblical prophecies about a transformed creation (e.g., Isaiah 65:17–25) would be fulfilled within history — a view called †Chiliasm or †Millenarianism. A common idea was that history would follow the pattern of creation. After the first six days (each a thousand years in accord with Psalm 90:4), a sabbath of one thousand years of Messianic earthly reign would precede the eternal kingdom.

However, belief in a millennial earthly paradise before the eternal kingdom came to be associated with hopes for extraordinary material prosperity and bodily pleasure. In reaction, other ancient writers such as Origen (ca. 185–254), Dionysius of Alexandria (ca. 198–264), and Jerome (ca. 347–420) interpreted the millennium in an allegorical and moral sense: Armageddon became the "triumph of God over sin and vice," and the thousand-year reign became the period when people embraced "obedience and chastity, for Satan is bound whenever people resist evil thoughts." 9

In the early fifth century, Augustine (354–430), following Tyconius (ca. 380), taught that the thousand-year reign of Christ and the saints began with Christ's first coming and continues in the Church until Christ's second coming — a view called amillennialism. 10 The first resurrection is spiritual and occurs in Baptism; the second resurrection is the general physical resurrection of the just and the unjust at the end of history. The thrones of 20:4 are the sees of bishops. The conversion of Constantine and the spread of Christianity through the empire shows that Satan is confined to the hearts of unbelievers, and the reign of the saints has begun.

In the present reign of the Church, the wheat and the tares remain mixed together until the last judgment and the beginning of the †eschatological kingdom. Before that occurs, the devil will be released and will test the Church. Augustine's interpretation became the dominant one through the early Middle Ages and beyond.

Late medieval interpreters such as Alexander Minorita (d. 1271) and Peter Olivi (1248–98) speculated that the thousand years refers to the Church's ascendancy that began with the conversion of Constantine in the early fourth century, and would end with the release of satan in the fourteenth century. The occurrence of the Great Western Schism (1348–1417) and the bubonic plague (1346–53), called the Black Death, confirmed this interpretation in the eyes of some. The Reformation period saw various revivals of †millenarianism, as well as revivals of Augustine's interpretation by the leading Reformers. Catholic interpreters of the sixteenth century also inclined toward Augustine's view. The Jesuit commentator Francisco Ribera (1537–91) interpreted the thousand years to be the period between Christ's death and the coming of the anti-christ. In contrast to Augustine, however, Ribera held that the millennial rule belongs to the souls of the faithful departed in Heaven rather than to the Church on earth. 11

Some subsequent interpreters expected the millennial kingdom to come gradually as the Church fulfills its mission, culminating in Christ's return—referred to as postmillennialism. Revivalists such as Jonathan Edwards (1703–1758) expected the millennium to be inaugurated through outpourings of the Spirit. Likewise, Charles Finney (1792–1875) envisioned the millennium as being inaugurated by evangelism and social reform such as the end of slavery and the promotion of temperance, with the timing of its arrival dependent on people's response (See 2 Peter 3:12). Twentieth-century Protestant advocates of the "social gospel" likewise adopted a postmillennial view. Some Catholics today expect a temporal era of peace, triumph, and unity for the Church before satan's final assault, the return of Christ, and the eternal kingdom. 12

The leading interpretation of the millennium among fundamentalist and some evangelical Christians today, premillennial †dispensationalism, arose in the early nineteenth century. According to this interpretation, Christ will return before the great tribulation (see sidebar, "The Great Tribulation," pp. 146–47), raise believers who have died, and †rapture—snatch up—all true Christians to Heaven. After seven years Christ will return with the Church and defeat the beast, the false prophet, and their armies. Then the Church will reign with Christ for a thousand years on a transformed earth, fulfilling Isaiah 65:18–25, "in a time of universal peace, prosperity, long life, and prevailing righteousness." 13 While the faithful Christians whom Christ has raised will live forever, the people who survive the tribulation and live during the millennium will enjoy long lives (Isaiah 65:20). Then satan will be released for a short time and organize an uprising that takes the form of a military assault against the reign of Christ and the saints in Jerusalem. God will intervene to send fire from Heaven to consume the armies of Gog and Magog and to cast satan into the lake of fire. Then the unrighteous who have died will be raised and judged, and God's eternal reign will begin.

The Catholic Church rejects †millenarianism, interpretations like dispensationalism that expect a visible earthly reign of Christ before the final judgment. 14 The Church also rejects the view that Christ's kingdom will come to pass through a human political program, through a "secular messianism" (Catechism 676), or even through the "progressive ascendancy" of the Church (Catechism 677). Rather, the kingdom will come "only by God's victory over the final unleashing of evil," and the descent of the new Jerusalem from Heaven (Catechism 677).

(Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture, Revelation, Peter S. Williamson)

Eric Ewanco

Similar issues . . .

[Related posting]|[Related posting]|[Related posting]|[Related posting]|[Related posting]
[Related posting]|[Related posting]|[Related posting]|[Related posting]|[Related posting]
[Related posting]|[Related posting]

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.