Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
back
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History

Emeka wrote:

Hi, guys —

Someone was criticizing Catholics saying that we falsely believe that Catholics become Christ and therefore God because of the phraseology of paragraphs 460 and 795 in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

I. Why Did The Word Become Flesh?

460 The Word became flesh to make us partakers of the divine nature: (2 Peter 1:4)

For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God.

(St. Irenaeus of Lyons, Adv. haeres. 3, 19, 1: PG 7/1, 939)

For the Son of God became man so that we might become God.

(St. Athanasius, De inc. 54, 3: PG 25, 192B)

The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods.

(St. Thomas Aquinas, Opusc. 57, 1-4)

"Christ is the Head of this Body"

795 Christ and his Church thus together make up the whole Christ (Christus totus). The Church is one with Christ. The saints are acutely aware of this unity:

Let us rejoice then and give thanks that we have become not only Christians, but Christ himself. Do you understand and grasp, brethren, God's grace toward us? Marvel and rejoice: we have become Christ. For if he is the head, we are the members; he and we together are the whole man. . . . The fullness of Christ then is the head and the members. But what does head and members mean? Christ and the Church.

— (St. Augustine, In Jo. ev. 21,8:PL 35, 1568)

Our redeemer has shown himself to be one person with the holy Church whom he has taken to himself.

— (Pope St. Gregory the Great, Moralia in Job, præf.,14:PL 75, 525A)

Head and members form as it were one and the same mystical person.

— (St. Thomas Aquinas, STh III,48, 2)

A reply of St. Joan of Arc to her judges sums up the faith of the holy doctors and the good sense of the believer:

"About Jesus Christ and the Church, I simply know they're just one thing, and we shouldn't complicate the matter."
(Acts of the Trial of Joan of Arc)



  • I know we don't believe such but why would the Catechism use such phrasing or choice of words?

Emeka

  { Why did the Catechism use this wording to explain our union with Christ, the Word of God? }

Bob replied:

Dear Emeka,

Thanks for the question.

The Church quotes the Scriptures and the Saints who use the language that some ignorant critics can't appreciate. 2 Peter 1:4 tells us that we are to become partakers of the divine nature. That means we are to become divinized in some sense. God adopts us as His children, but not like we adopt a pet, which simply remains a dog or cat, but God makes us like Himself, like real children of God — like that thing that Pinocchio dreamed about in becoming a real boy from a mere puppet.

That is an analogy to us becoming children of God, not by our intrinsic nature, but by grace.

What we receive in the Resurrection is far beyond our imagination, but we will become like Christ, and are in some mystical way connected to Him as He is connected to us.

St. Paul uses the language of the body of Christ to describe the Church (for example cf. Colossians 2:19 and 1 Corinthians 10:17), and ever since, it has been part of the theology of many saints.

In the Catechism references you cited, refer to the footnotes to see St. Augustine, St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Irenaeus and St. Athanasius, all utilizing this same language and description of who we are. That's a lot of Early Church Fathers.

We are members of Christ's Own Body, and the Eucharist is the primary way we connect and become one. If you realize that God is a Holy Trinity, who all share the same life, yet are distinct, and then realize that God intends to bring us into His Life, it is mind-blowing!

The essential qualifier is the distinction between nature and grace, and without that, we would be talking nonsense or blasphemy so, in the end:

What God is by nature, we become by grace.

Peace,

Bob Kirby

Emeka replied:

Thanks Bob,

But in that case, why didn't the Catechism just say:

We become like Christ rather than saying we become Christ and, in the other quote, that we become like God instead of God?

Saying that we become Christ or God is not a right thing to say.

Emeka

Bob replied:

Emeka,

The literalness for which you aim is unnecessary for those who understand truth. Christ used hyperbole often to underscore a point: 29  if your eye causes you to sin, tear it out," (Matthew 5:29). . . 26 If anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple," (Luke 14:26) etc.

Think also of Matthew 25:31ff. Read this whole passage about the King and judgment. He says when you didn't do it to the least of these, you didn't do it to me. He presents no distinction. This notion of all in Christ, are one with Christ in some mystical way is derived from Christ Himself.

It was common for Jesus' enemies to try to catch Him in some sort of trap by presenting some black and white set of alternatives that he would be forced to choose from — the irony was that they themselves were trapped by their narrow vision and could not see, as God sees. For them, you are either God or man, but surely not both.

Jesus couldn't be God because he was man. That was their literal truth. They didn't allow for another possibility — that He was both. So likewise, don't let the idea of literalness dissuade you from the greater truth: that we will become Jesus Christ in some sense — a metaphysical unity that defies human understanding.

Here you must employ the same kind of theology that we use with respect to the Trinity: Three Persons yet One God. We speak of one God, yet the Father is not the Son, nor the Spirit.

  • Is there not one God?
  • Is the Son, the Father?

30 I and the Father are one, said Jesus. (John 10:30)

  • Is that simply a moral unity as the Jehovah Witnesses would suggest or is He and the Father one in some other way?

If you are getting confused, don't worry, you are not alone. It took centuries for the Church to define the Trinity, the Hypostatic Union and other such concepts. That said, if your mind is not stretched, you are not growing in awe of God, who defies expectations.

Let me leave you with one more thing to ponder.

  • Do you remember when Mary and Joseph brought Jesus to the temple as a baby?

Simeon said to Mary and a sword will pierce your own soul. (cf. Luke 2:33ff).

  • Did Mary ever get stabbed with a sword?

Not that we know of, but when Jesus hung on the Cross a soldier put a lance through Him. Mary stood at the foot of the Cross and, as she watched her Son, who she was united with in every dimension of His Passion, felt every inch of the blade. Just meditate on those words of Simeon and it might become clearer.

35 So that the thoughts of hearts might be made manifest. (Luke 2:35)

Peace,

Bob Kirby

Emeka replied:

Wow —

Nice explanation!

Thanks,

Emeka

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.