Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
back
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History


Larry wrote:

Hi, guys —

My cousin was recently married. She is Catholic and has never been married. The man she married was also Catholic but has been divorced. He had applied for an annulment, but is still waiting for it to come through. They were married by a former Jesuit priest who left the order. The religious ceremony took place in a mansion, not a church. They wanted their marriage to be blessed, but nevertheless, decided they could not wait. I attended the wedding reception along with many of my family members, however we were not totally aware of all the facts.

I did not even know that her fiancé was Catholic, so I thought perhaps his first marriage would not be recognized.

  • Can anyone help me with this?

I have no idea what would have been the appropriate thing to do. I am not extremely close to my cousin and so did not feel comfortable prying. I figured I couldn't make a judgment based on what I did not know.

Please shed some light for me — Anyone.

Larry

  { Should I have attended this wedding since I was unsure if the fiancé received an annulment? }

Mike replied:

Dear Larry,

I wish we could help but your question is one that should be directed toward the marriage tribunal. As stated on our question page:

None of us on this site would be able to make any helpful comments because we can't give either positive or negative answers on questions that are out of our realm of expertise.

We would be second guessing on judgments we trust the Church to make.

Although your cousin wanted their marriage blessed, it appears they didn't really care about the Church's opinion. Waiting for a reply would have been the appropriate thing to do.

What we know is for a Catholic to have a valid marriage, they have to marry according to form . . . meaning:

  • they must marry in the Church (easy)
  • if they marry a non-Catholic, they must get a disposition from the local bishop,
    (pretty easy) and
  • though, the non-Catholic spouse does not have to change their faith, they must agree not to interfere with the Catholic spouse's obligation to raise your children as faithful Catholics.

Mike

Eric replied:

Larry —

While my colleague is correct and we are not trained in canon law, this situation looks quite doubtful. The Church's principle is that if someone got married and their spouse has not died, before they can marry someone else after a divorce, they need to get an annulment to prove that the previous marriage was not actually valid.

If an annulment is in process and you attempt to marry before it completes, that marriage would not be considered valid (that is, it is not a real marriage in the eyes of God). That's fairly straightforward.

Generally, it is not advisable to attend the wedding of a marriage you know to be invalid (which, in this case, the evidence is strong that it would have been). This would give scandal as it has the appearance of endorsing the action.

It is canonically forbidden to serve as a witness (best man/maid of honor) for such a wedding.

In extreme circumstances — say it was an immediate family member and, not attending, would cause irreparable harm — it might be permissible to attend if your disapproval was made clear.

Eric

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.