Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
back
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History


Daisy wrote:

Dear Sir(s):

My ex-husband and I were married in a Catholic Church and were married for five years.

He wants to have our marriage annulled so that he can marry his new wife in a Catholic Church.
His reason is below and I have no idea what it really means.

  • Can you help clarify what the Church is saying for me?

2. Grave Lack of Discretionary Judgment Concerning Essential Marital Rights and Duties [1095,2] You or your spouse was affected by some serious circumstances or factors that made you unable to judge or evaluate either the decision to marry or the ability to create a true marital relationship.

Daisy

  { Can you explain what the Church is saying in this letter (from the Tribunal)? }

Eric replied:

Hi, Daisy —

I'm not an expert on the subject but my layman's interpretation would say, perhaps it means that he wasn't "ready" for marriage when he married you in the sense that he either:

  • didn't understand what marriage was about, or
  • made the decision for the wrong reasons.

In a way, it's saying that someone's judgment:

  • was seriously impaired when they made the decision to marry, or
  • they didn't know what they were getting into.

Eric Ewanco

Fr. Francis replied:

Dear Daisy,

Giving a very simple explanation, annulments find their origins in the Scriptures in Matthew 19 where the word "porneia" — although variously translated, seems best to be translated as "illicit sexual unions", is used. This exception clause to the absolute prohibition of divorce originally given by Jesus, was added by the early Church at the time of Matthew after the Council of Jerusalem. (See Acts 15.)

At the Council of Jerusalem, Gentiles coming into the Church were freed from such Mosaic traditions as circumcision, keeping kosher and the like (Paul's "works of the Law"). The incoming Gentiles did present one major difficulty:

Many had entered marriage in relationships considered to be "porneia" or illicit sexual unions (for example, marrying very close relatives etc.).

In Matthew's community, Gentile converts were coming into the Jewish Christian Church in great numbers. These illicit sexual unions were considered to be null and void and not marriages at all.

Another example can be found in 1 Corinthians 7, where Paul speaks of baptized members of the Church being married to a non-baptized person. He does not forbid this though; most of these couples (at the time) began as two non-baptized couples with one converting. However, there were instances where the non-baptized spouse, especially the husband, not only protested his spouse's new faith but totally rejected it, ultimately causing a "divorce". Here is what we call the "the Pauline Privilege".

A Pauline Privilege is the dissolution of a purely natural marriage which had been contracted between two non-Christians, one of whom has since become a Christian. The Pauline Privilege is so-named because it is based upon the Apostle Paul's words in 1 Corinthians 7:12-16.

In 1 Corinthians 7, Paul gives instructions concerning problem marriages. In verses 10-11 he discusses sacramental marriages (marriages between two baptized people) and indicates that they are indissoluble. It is possible for a husband and wife in a sacramental marriage to separate, but they cannot remarry. They must remain separated and not attempt to marry again, or they must reconcile with one another.

In verses 12-16, Paul gives instructions concerning the thornier case of a couple who have only a natural marriage. A sacramental marriage, one that communicates supernatural grace, requires that both partners be baptized. If neither is, or only one is, their union is only a natural one. Sometimes one party to a natural marriage converts and becomes a Christian, which can cause the marital problems that Christians are expected to face. (Luke 12:51-53, Luke 18:29-30.)

While natural marriages should be preserved if at all possible (1 Corinthians 7:12-14, 16), they can be dissolved in some cases. Paul tells us, in verse 15, that if the unbelieving spouse refuses to live with the Christian partner, the unbeliever can be allowed to withdraw from the marriage, leaving the Christian partner unbound, free to remarry. The Pauline Privilege thus may apply when the Church dissolves a natural marriage after one partner has become Christian and there is a just cause, such as the non-Catholic's refusal to live at peace with the Christian partner.

the Pauline Privilege differs from an annulment because it dissolves a real but natural marriage. An annulment is a declaration that there was never a valid marriage to begin with.

The Pauline Privilege does not apply when two baptized people marry, and later, one quits being Christian. These people had a sacramental marriage forged between them, and this marriage is indissoluble, even if one partner is failing to fulfill his marital responsibilities. In that case, 1 Corinthians 7:10-11, which concerns such problem marriages, applies.

The Pauline Privilege also does not apply when a Christian has married a non-Christian. In those cases, a natural marriage exists and can be dissolved for a just cause, but by, what is called, the Petrine Privilege, rather than by the Pauline Privilege. The Petrine Privilege is so-named because it is reserved to the Holy See, so only Rome can grant the Petrine Privilege (which it seldom does).

A biblical precedent for the Petrine Privilege, where some of the faithful marry unbelievers and then are permitted to divorce them, is found in Ezra 10:1-14, where the Jews put away their foreign (pagan) wives.the Petrine Privilege


Over the centuries, the Church has discovered other "issues" that it considers to actually annul a marriage that has been attempted. One commonly known one, is when one spouse "refuses to consent to having children" when marriage, by its nature, must be "open to children".

Another issue concerns "lack of discretion". This is a relatively new, but sadly necessary, issue that discerns whether a marriage is actually annulled. Such factors as:

  • age — (a young couple when they got married, say in their teens, or immaturity of one or both members of the couple);
  • circumstances: perhaps a "child out of wedlock" or some other force (like the parents) "forced" a marriage on the couple;
  • I also believe that alcoholism and drug addiction are considered by the Church to inhibit the free and mature consent needed to enter into a real marriage;
  • Of course, another, is "solid sexual maturity". Meaning both are solid in their sense of themselves as a heterosexual man and woman. Uncertainty or confusion in this area is dynamite in marriage;
  • Another would be an "inability" to enter into an exclusive and faithful union because of family history, etc. or immaturity of a personal nature; some people really can't enter into a real exclusive and faithful marriage;
  • Another is "a grave doubt entering the marriage", not just the little fear on the wedding day, but time and again, I have heard individuals say:

      "I knew it was all wrong" or "I really knew it shouldn't be happening" as
      she was . . . or "I was walking down the aisle . . ."

Although I am a priest who has assisted individuals with annulments, I am not a canon lawyer.

The examples I have given above are from experience with individuals seeking annulments.
Pre-Cana preparation does assist couples entering marriage to at least begin to really think about "marriage" versus "the wedding", but as our Holy Father recently wrote:

"Far more is needed to assist couples in preparing for marriage.  This preparation extends into the home in the way children, teens, and young adults are formed."

Pope St. John Paul II

I hope this has helped.

Fr Francis

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.