Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History

Andrew wrote:

Hi, guys —

Pax et bonum!

  • How could the Church during the Medieval Ages speak of great theological problems but not even accept heliocentrism?


  { How could the Church speak of great theological problems but not even accept heliocentrism? }

Bob replied:

Hi, Andrew —


There may have been exceptional philosophers but not too many empirical scientists of the same caliber. Galileo suffered from this dearth among his contemporaries, to his great injustice, however, an analogy from today can shed light on his situation and others.

It is hard to imagine when we take so much of it for granted but if someone came along and suddenly taught something that turned our view of the world inside out we may offer the same resistance.

Sometimes there is a needed tension between science and philosophy often because politics is enmeshed with it. Take climate change, for example. It is anathema (for the politically correct) to reject the theories of global warming — even though the data has been knowingly falsified, politically charged, and accepted as fact. There is good reason to remain skeptical as many scientists reject the conclusion. They point to sun spots and other natural phenomena as far more powerful than man to affect substantial change. Second, the climate has undergone cyclical changes throughout the epochs, and lastly, political motivations tend to corrupt the scientific interpretation of any data.

So I, and many others, are like the Medieval Church. We won't concede that the facts of climate change are what the political pundits, and the scientists that are aligned with, say they are until the proof supersedes all other data. There is not that level of data without contradiction so I remain skeptical and unmoved.

  • Will history prove me ignorant?

We'll see.


Bob Kirby

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.