Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
back
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History

Charles Tate wrote:

Hi, guys —

  • Is it required that all Catholics believe that all people in the Bible literally existed?

A Catholic scholar named John J. Collins states that the consensus of scholars says the prophet Daniel did not exist.

Charles Tate

  { Is it required that all Catholics believe that all people in the Bible literally existed, like Daniel? }

Eric replied:

Charles,

While I suspect Collins is full of hot air, no, it is not required for Catholics to believe that all people in the Bible literally existed.

For example, the book of Tobit (featuring Tobias and Tobit) is widely acknowledged as being an extended parable. Some people argue the same for Jonah. Speaking of parables, the characters in Jesus's parables typically did not exist for real (I say "typically" because in one parable, Abraham was mentioned, and he is traditionally understood as a historical person, and Lazarus is mentioned, who some speculate may be the man Jesus raised from the dead). 

Traditionally, Daniel is regarded as a historical person. He is even venerated as a saint. 

Most of this so-called "scholarship" that undermines the historical existence of Biblical characters is just bogus and outdated. But not heretical (unless you argue Jesus didn't really exist). Nevertheless, if the scholars are right, it doesn't impact the veracity of the Catholic faith as we do not hold as a matter of faith that all these people, in particular in the Old Testament, are historical.

Eric Ewanco

Charles replied:

Eric,

Thank you so much for such a fast reply.

I am often attacked in social media by atheists for my Catholic faith. An atheist had brought this to my attention, and I had no reply. I was very shocked that Daniel could be fictional since I thought as a Catholic, we had to believe Daniel was real due to his messianic prophecies. 

Now my faith is more grounded.

Thank you!

Charles

Eric replied:

Charles —

Our faith is in the text, or what it reveals, independent of who actually wrote it. The prophecies are valid, regardless of who committed them to paper.

Eric Ewanco

Charles replied:

Eric,

Thanks for all the information you provided.

Charles

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.