Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
back
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History


Joseph wrote:

Hi, guys —

I am a final-year medical student and am constantly faced with questions regarding the immorality of (IVF) In-Vitro Fertilization. My current understanding is that it breaks the natural law of union and procreation and hence undermines:

  • the sanctity of Marriage, and
  • the strength of the family relationship.
  • Does this same argument apply for sterile persons . . . say with Kartagener's syndrome, where the male is simply unable to provide the cilia to transport the sperm along the ducts?
  • Where are the best sources for associated abuses or problems with IVF?

Many thanks,

Joseph

  { Does the immorality of IVF apply to sterile people and where are the best sources for IVF abuses? }

Steve Ray replied:

Dear Joseph,

The main argument against in-vitro fertilization is not that it breaks the natural union (although that is one reason against it) but because when the sperm and egg unite outside the womb, there is a high mortality rate among the fertilized ovums.

Only some of the eggs survive long enough to be implanted in the womb, but even then, it is a risky proposition. Regarding the ones that do not survive before they are implanted, these fertilized ovums were at one time human beings. Their death, caused by the fact that they are outside the normal environment of the womb, is thus equivalent to murder.

The philosophy of allowing some to die so that others may live is not the prerogative of the laboratory technician. Only God has that power.

Steve

Richard replied:

Hi, Joseph —

You said you were interested in good sources. As always, I'd recommend:

My understanding is that IVF remains immoral, even in the case you described, because the new life is being conceived apart from a normal marital union.

— RC

John replied:

Hi, Joe —

There is a bigger problem with IVF. Many eggs are fertilized outside the womb and only one or two are chosen to be implanted in the woman. The rest are frozen.

This violates the dignity of human life; these are people we are freezing.

In Him,

John C. DiMascio

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.