Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History

Emilia Varona wrote:

Hi, guys—

I have a hard time believing that Pope Alexander VI was infallible due to many reasons:

  • he had a mistress
  • he annulled his daughter's (Lucrecia Borgia) marriage six times
  • and he sentenced Savaonarola to die; having been burned in a stake.

  • How could he be even lucid with regards to Church doctrines?

Please let me know what you think.

Thank you,


  { How could Pope Alexander VI have been infallible or even lucid in Church doctrines? }

John replied:

Hi Emilia,

Thanks for your question.

You seem to have a misunderstanding of what infallibility is.

It is not impeccability.  That is, it does not refer to the Pope's personal Holiness.

Infallibility is a gift which protects the Pope from officially teaching defining error as truth in the area of faith and morals.

That does not mean that he himself will not violate the same truth he teaches.

For instance, in Acts 15, St. Peter definitively declares that Gentiles did not have to keep the Kosher Laws or be circumcised in order to become Christians.

Later, we read in Galatians that he violates, at very least, the spirit of this infallible declaration. St. Paul writes that he had to rebuke Peter for not eating at the same table with Gentiles, so as to keep the Jewish believers happy.

In granting his daughter six annulments, Alexander was not teaching on annulments, though he could have been breaking the Church's doctrine on this issue.

As for Savaonarola, again, Alexander seems to be guilty of a pretty serious personal sin!!
The execution of Savaonarola, along with the later execution of John Huss, was part of the sad background of the Protestant Rebellion.

As the Catechism says (CCC 817), anytime there is division, there is most likely sin by men on both sides of the issue. This incident is truly a black eye on the face of Church history. However, this horrible execution is not covered by papal infallibility either as we distinguish between official teachings re-affirmed by the Pope under the guidance of the Holy Spirit from his personal holiness. (e.g. his personal actions or behavior)

God Bless,

John DiMascio

Similar issues . . .

[Related posting]| [Related posting]| [Related posting]| [Related posting]| [Related posting]
[Related posting]| [Related posting]


Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.