|
 |
Michael
Deem
wrote:
|
Hi, guys —
I have two questions:
- How can any act be a mortal sin for
the faithful, including eating meat on
Feast day(s), where in Galatians 2:15-16 Paul says that we are justified through
faith and not works?
This is the main teaching of fundamentalists:
That we are saved by grace through faith.
I also understand Paul said faith without
works is dead; wherein we will do what
is right and just, by our faith.
- Second, how is it that any instruction,
position, or decision of the Pope cannot
be questioned when Galatians 2:11 starts
the argument of Paul's questioning of Peter
at Antioch?
Michael
|
{
What is wrong with the main teaching of fundamentalists and why can't the Pope be questioned? }
|
Eric
replied:
Hi, Michael —
The subject of faith and works is
a complex one. I suggest you search
our knowledge base for keywords such
as justification and works.
In essence, when Paul refers to works in
Romans and Galatians, he's referring
to the Law of Moses given the Jews
(see Acts 15:1, Galatians 3:10, Deuteronomy 26:17, Galatians 2:14, Galatians
4:24), in particular circumcision
(Galatians 5:2-3). This term, "works
of law", is a technical term
even found in the Dead Sea Scrolls
that means the ceremonial elements
of the Law of Moses. So St. Paul
is not saying that our salvation
is not dependent on what you do.
That would contradict many other
Scriptures, including those in Paul's
writings (Romans 2:6).
We as Catholics can say that we are
saved by grace through faith working
through love
(Galatians 5:6).
Not eating meat on Fridays (we
don't abstain on feast days) comes
from the power Jesus gave to the
Church to bind and loose (Matthew
16:19), which refers to disciplinary
matters, and from Hebrews 13:17,
which says to obey your leaders.
It is rooted in 1 Corinthians
9:25-27 and Jesus's assumption
that we will fast (Matthew 6:16-17, Matthew 9:15, Mark 2:20, Luke
5:35).
The Jews at that time fasted twice
a week (Luke 18:12), on Mondays and
Thursdays. A first century Christian
handbook for those entering the faith,
the Didache or Teaching of the Twelve
Apostles, said you shall not fast
like the hypocrites on
Mondays and Thursdays, but on Wednesdays
and Fridays. Eventually, in the West,
that was abbreviated to abstinence
from meat on Fridays.
As for your second question, this
was a matter, not of an official
action on Peter's part or a doctrine
he taught, but based on his inconsistent
behavior. Basically, he wasn't living
up to what he himself had proclaimed
in Acts 15. So Paul, who was also
an Apostle, rebuked him.
It's entirely possible to criticize
a pope for acting contrary to the
faith. It's also possible to question
some of his official actions. In
fact, St. Catherine of Sienna told
the pope he should move back to Rome
from France. She was even a layperson.
Nevertheless, that's very different
from questioning him on a matter
of faith or morals that he proclaims,
particularly in his capacity of confirming
the brethren in their faith.
Eric
|
John
replied:
Hi, Michael —
Thanks for you question:
Mortal sin is, in effect, a denial
of ones faith through an act of the
will. For a sin to be considered
mortal, (3) three elements must be
present. The sin:
- must be of a grave nature
- the person must have time to
consider the consequences, and
- the person must give full consent
of the will.
So mortal sin is not something that
happens at the drop of a hat.
In Romans 4, Paul quotes Genesis
15 and says Abraham believed God
and it was accounted to him as righteousness. (Genesis 15:6) So according to your theology, that
must be the point where Abraham was
justified and saved.
The only problem
is that the author of Hebrews points
to Genesis 12 where Abraham leaves
his family and homeland to follow
God as the point where he had saving
faith then James points to the binding
of Isaac as yet another point where
Abraham is justified. (James 2:18-24)
So the only conclusion is that Salvation
is not static, but rather dynamic.
It grows and matures throughout one's
life as the righteousness of Christ
manifests itself in our life.
Carefully read that great chapter
8 of Romans. Notice that although
Paul says there is no condemnation
for those in Christ, (Romans 8:1) later on in
the chapter he says,
13-14 If by the Spirit we put to death
the deeds of the flesh, then we
are the sons of God.
Romans 8:13-14
Well, the sentence starts with the
word If. That implies
we have a choice and that choice
is to follow the leading of the Holy
Spirit and by the power of the Holy
Spirit resist sinning (committing
deeds of the flesh). Now we know
from chapter 7 of Romans that even
Paul struggled to defeat sin in his
life. Hence the answer is to repent
of sin once one commits it. 1 John 1:9 tells us that:
9 If we confess our sin, He (Jesus)
is faithful to forgive us and
cleanse us from all unrighteousness. (1 John 1:9)
Nevertheless, it's not just a matter
of getting forgiveness when we sin.
Christ, gives us the grace to resist
and overcome sin as we mature as
Christians. So good works aren't only signs that we are saved as
you put it. The more we flex our
faith muscle by responding
to grace, we increase or faith and
therefore our justification grows
in quality.
So Salvation is not this one time
event that is static. Yes, we are
objectively justified when we are born
again, but that starts the
beginning of a new life empowered
by the Holy Spirit to overcome sin.
As Paul writes to the Philippians:
6 He who began a good work in you
will be faithful to complete it
until the day of Christ Jesus. (Philippians 1:6)
So it is all a work of Christ in
us. Every good work we do as a Christian
is the work of Christ in us. We don't
discount free will. We can choose
to cooperate or we can choose not
to cooperate. The ability even to choose, is
indeed, also a free gift from Christ.
I hope this helps,
John
|
Michael
replied:
Thank you.
Your all very helpful and your
answers make more sense than those of fundamentalists.
I'm seeing Protestant churches as
more of a snack and the Catholic
Church as a full course meal. What
appears to be discouraging at first
is actually very beautiful through
the eyes of the Holy See.
I'm finding the Catechism to be very helpful
for the most part but some questions
weren't answered and the ministry
of the laity has graciously filled
that need.
It has been so helpful that my wife
(a stern Protestant) is now speaking
of RCIA and full communion with the
Church, especially with your answers
to salvation and grace.
Thank you all for your ministry and
hard work. God be with you all.
P.S. I'm coming home :- )
Your Brother in Christ,
Michael Deem
|
|
|
|