Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Holy Orders-Priesthood
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History

Michael Wecke wrote:

Hi, Mike —

I hope you are well.

If you have a moment, perhaps you can help with this question and perhaps, in your answer,
take into account the Scriptural reference below:

  • Why doesn't the Roman Catholic Church ordain women to the priesthood?

Please also have a look at what a bishop from an independent Catholic church had to say about this:

Please understand that our Church can no longer deny the ordination of qualified, educated women for the ministry.

The Old Catholic Church in Germany and the Anglican Church show that women can serve equally to their counterparts in the Church. We have to rethink our male-orientated and dominated theologies. There are good reason we call the Church: Mother Church!

The above Bishop's argument is also based on Galatians 3:28,

“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28 KJV)

Thank you very much.

Kind regards,

North Shore City. Auckland
New Zealand

  { Why doesn't the Church ordain women priests when these faith leaders encourage and defend it? }

Mike replied:

Hi, Michael —

This web posting and the links within the web posting should clarify a lot for you, as this is one of those questions we have answered pretty well.

I don't know what you want me to say about a bishop who obviously is dissenting from the Magisterium of the Church.  It is truly scandalous and very sad. For the faithful in the Church,
I apologize for his behavior and statements.

FYI: The Old Catholic Church is a schismatic group who broke with the Church.

I'll let my colleagues comment on the Scripture quoted and how it does or doesn't relate to the issue at hand.


Eric replied:

Hi, Michael —

St. Paul's point here is in the context of a Judaizing controversy:

Some were teaching that Gentiles must be circumcised according to the Law of Moses and follow the dietary requirements, etc. Galatians is written to refute this. His point is that Gentiles have salvation apart from the law; that Abraham was justified by faith (Galatians 3:8) and that the Gentile's inheritance comes from Abraham's covenant (verse 14), not from the law which came 430 years later (verse 17).

In other words, they were introducing (or rather perpetuating) a dichotomy between Jew and Greek that Jesus erased (verse 25). All of us, Jews and Greeks (Gentiles), are justified by faith (verse 26, verse 29). The message here in verse 28 is that salvation is now universal, and comes by faith in Christ. We are one; the enmity that existed between Jews and Gentiles is over.
Verse 28 cannot be wrenched out of context or isolated. The point is not that there are no distinctions at all between male and female, or that there aren't proper roles to each. After all,
St. Paul instructed that women are not to teach or have authority over a man (1 Timothy 2:12). Galatians 3:28 must be interpreted consistently with this verse.

In light of my answer, I would encourage you to read all of Galatians 3.


Michael replied:

Hi, Mike —

Thank you for providing such clarity with all the posts. My thanks also go to Eric Ewanco for putting Galatians 3:28 in its proper context.

This bishop does indeed espouse the ordination of women into the priesthood in the foreseeable future. For now he uses Galatians 3:28 as a basis for ordaining women to the diaconate. I have no problem with that but this just constitutes his first step to women's role in the ministry.

Well, my arithmetic is not that good, but the first step, i.e. deaconess, is already in the major orders and the second step can only be ordination of this deaconess to the priesthood. I can't wait for the next RCIA programme.

Again, thank you for your speedy response. This is really much appreciated!

Kind regards,

North Shore City, Auckland
New Zealand

Eric followed-up:

Hi, Michael —

With respect to woman deacons, it is important to note that within the history of the Church, although there have existed deaconesses, they were not ordained.

They were employed in an age when Baptism was done by full immersion in the nude, and for the sake of propriety baptized women during that time.


John replied:

Hi, Michael —

Just for the record, Old Catholics rejected Vatican I and it's declaration of papal infallibility.

This was the council that defined papal infallibility, not the pope, so the Old Catholics are not rejecting papal infallibility, they are rejecting the infallibility of the extraordinary Magisterium.

That said, these guys are really out there.


Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.