|
 |
Martin
wrote:
|
Dear Friends,
Bless you for the work you do. I need your
help badly.
My wife and I joined the Church together shortly
after we were married. We've now been married
51 years.
I think I've been a good Catholic up to now.
- I pray daily
- attend Mass regularly, and
- love the Lord and His people very sincerely.
On a more external level:
- I've taught Catholicism
- am an Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion
serving at a hospital; and
- on a single occasion, we donated one
fourth of our net worth to the Church not
counting other donations.
Nevertheless, I'm desperately fearful I am
now on track to forfeit God's incredible love.
I am in my early 70's and have been blessed
with extraordinarily good health. My physique
is muscular and trim due to exercise, I still
have a full head of hair with a little gray,
and my mind remains sharp (I have a Ph.D.
in nuclear physics with special interests
in quantum gravity), but my libido also remains
healthy.
My wife defeated breast cancer over 20 years
ago and cannot take estrogen. She loves me
dearly, but she's far happier when I put no
pressure on her to fulfill my sexual desires.
I have succumbed to masturbation. I have tried
to dismiss the urge and offer that up to God
but have failed. I even use pornography to
make the act quick, seeking relief versus
any prolonged pleasure.
I have consulted priests on this and they
have indicated my situation probably isn't
a serious sin and that I could make a good
act of contrition without going to Confession.
I cannot tolerate such vagueness about the
most important thing in my life — continuing
to be in the fullness of God's grace, especially
when I say I will amend my life, with the
help of His grace then completely fail to
do so. That said, I go to Reconciliation repeatedly,
back and forth, with the same sin, hoping
that God will accept my sincere intention.
I am requesting your help to assist me in
defining my alternatives:
- to defeat this behavior whatever it takes,
as in Matthew 18:5-9:
8 If your hand or your foot causes
you to stumble, cut it off and throw
it from you;
it is better for you to enter life crippled
or lame, than to have two hands or two
feet and be cast into the eternal fire.
(Matthew 18:5-9)
or
- to adopt some middle-ground behavior wherein
I can obtain physical relief but yet be
assured I have not offended Him.
Priests must confront this matter frequently
and choose alternative No. 1: to defeat . . . As one with only
a layman's vocation, I find myself in a
dreadful conundrum.
Thank you,
Martin
|
{
What are some ideas for dealing
with this sexual habit within my marriage without offending Him? }
|
Eric
replied:
Martin,
Thanks for your question. I empathize
with your difficult situation and
I commend you for not imposing yourself
on your wife — that is a meritorious
act of love.
The priests who said:
. . . my situation
probably isn't a serious sin and
that I could make a good act of contrition
without going to Confession.
have done you a grave disservice
and have betrayed Catholic teaching.
Masturbation is a grave sin, and
when committed deliberately — with
full consent of the will — it
is a mortal sin that causes you to
lose the grace of salvation. It may
be, in your case, there are elements
that make it less than full consent,
but it should always be treated as
something to avoid with all your
strength and which merits Confession
when committed. The Catechism is
worth reading on this point:
Read
the whole page, but especially the
sections on chastity, self-mastery,
and masturbation and heavens, find
a priest who is faithful to the Catholic
faith.
I'm not entirely clear on what you
mean by solution 1, but to be clear,
self-mutilation, in a literal sense,
would be contrary to Church teaching.
Nevertheless, I know this sin seems
impossible to conquer right now.
I know you feel desperate and helpless
and feel enormous pressure to satisfy
your desires but I assure you, that
given time and not a little bit of
valor, living a life of abstinence
is well within the grasp of any man.
You are not the only one in a situation
like this and it is possible to be
chaste. Not easy, to be sure, not
simple, with its share of ups and
downs, but it gets easier over time.
A journey of a thousand miles begins
with a single step. It seems insurmountable
now but it won't seem so bad later.
This is a challenge that the Lord
has given you to draw you closer
to Him. The struggle with chastity
is a great proving ground for faith.
It allows you to learn dependence
on God and reliance on His grace.
It allows you to strengthen your
will and train yourself in the way
of righteousness. As St. Paul says,
athletes deny themselves all sorts
of things to win the prize. (1 Corinthians 9:24-25) Run as
though to win. Look at yourself as
a martyr for chastity — you
die to yourself, to your own will
and desires, for the sake of the
Gospel. Also remember this is a spiritual
battle — satan wants your soul
and you have to be more determined
to be saved, than he is determined
to get you damned. It is a battle
and you must be man enough to fight
it. Take courage and don't be afraid
— God is with you. Ask for
the Holy Spirit's help. Seek the
Blessed Mother's intercession. Do
not give up! Remember it is not the
soldier who never falls who is honored,
but the one who gets up and fights
again.
This will help you love God more
and more deeply and be strengthened
in your faith. Like gold being refined
seven times, you are being refined
in the fire. Submit to the refinement,
surrender yourself totally to God
and rely on him with every fiber
of your being.
Eric
|
Martin
replied:
Eric,
Thank you very much for your response.
I've read the Catechism and,
as on many issues, it's pretty
black and white, not much elaboration
on things that might be gray. That's
why I consulted several priests.
I don't think they could all have done you [and me] a grave disservice
and have betrayed Catholic teaching.
Apart from my own hang-up, the medical
profession widely acclaims masturbation
to be an important aid to preventing
prostate cancer. And all surveys
since Kinsey have shown, essentially,
that 99% of men masturbate and 1
% are liars.
Notwithstanding, I certainly take
your point that, This is
a challenge that the Lord has given
you to draw you closer to Him.
As I'm sure you are aware,
the Church has active theological
studies currently underway on this
matter, reexamining forbiddance for
instances not involving procreation.
Bless you,
Martin
|
Eric
replied:
Martin,
You said:
I've read
the Catechism and, as on many issues,
it's pretty black and white,
not much elaboration on things that
might be gray. That's why I
consulted several priests. I don't
think they could all have done you [and me] a grave disservice
and have betrayed Catholic teaching.
I rechecked what you said those priests
said:
. . . my situation
probably isn't a serious sin and
that I could make a good act of contrition
without going to Confession.
I should have been nuanced in my
response, so let me clarify. It is
possible to interpret this in a manner
consistent with Catholic teaching, if
by my situation is
meant some sort of habit or compulsion,
and if
by serious sin is
meant a commission of an objectively
grave sin which is subjectively venial.
In this case, it is generally good
practice to go to Confession anyway,
since it is hard sometimes to discern
when full consent of the will happens,
and since there is grace in the sacrament
for avoiding it in the future.
If by my situation is
meant being deprived of an outlet
for sexual release, I do not agree
that this makes this sin not
a serious sin. This sin is
always and objectively gravely sinful
but, while masturbation is always
of its nature gravely sinful, as
I've noted, depending on your state
of mind at the time, a particular
commission of it may not meet the
condition for a mortal sin.
You said:
Apart from my own hang-up, the medical
profession widely acclaims masturbation
to be an important aid to preventing
prostate cancer. And all surveys
since Kinsey have shown, essentially,
that 99% of men masturbate and 1
% are liars.
That may be so (or it could be one
of these scientific findings that,
like many, turn out to be proven wrong
in ten years), but it is never permissible
to do evil that good may result.
Look at it this way:
If you succeed
at abstaining from levels of masturbation
that would prevent prostate cancer,
and get cancer, you will receive
much more eternal glory that lasts
much longer and is worth much more
than your remaining days on earth.
You said:
Notwithstanding, I certainly take
your point that, This is
a challenge that the Lord has given
you to draw you closer to Him.
As I'm sure you
are aware, the Church has active
theological studies currently underway
on this matter, reexamining forbiddance
for instances not involving procreation.
This is an urban myth. If someone
claims there is such a study — and
I mean a study that could actually
influence Magisterial teaching, not
some disaffected group of dissident
academics —
I challenge them to identify it and
produce the evidence. The Church's
teaching on human sexuality is infallible
and irreformable, so it would not
be possible to reverse it.
Eric
|
John
replied:
Martin,
Let's look at the logic of the two
claims here:
- One the claim that masturbation
is an important aid in preventing
prostate cancer.
- The second is that 99% of men
masturbate and 1% lie
(actually
I think Kinsey had the numbers
at 97% and 3%, but no matter).
Logic dictates that if both these
claims are true, prostate cancer
should be extremely rare!
Since that's not case, one of these
claims — probably
the former — isn't true.
That leaves us with masturbation
being very common. Well, that may
be true, but it doesn't make it morally
correct, similar to a sterile act
which is purely selfish. It involves
fantasy and objectification of (another person|other people). While it could be called
the common cold of sins, it remains
a moral disorder because of its
intrinsically selfish nature.
John
|
Martin
replied:
Eric said:
The Church's
teaching on human sexuality is infallible
and irreformable, so it would not
be possible to reverse it.
Magisterial teaching, while to be
taken very seriously, is not infallible
and is reversible when,
later on, a new interpretation comes
to bear on a matter.
Even the Pope's encyclicals
are not infallible. However, I don't
wish to expound upon Cannon Law — you
can clarify this for yourself.
Thank you.
Martin
|
Paul
replied:
Hi, Martin —
Just my quick two cents on this.
The dogma of infallibility is not
simply canon law, but the official
teaching of the Church authoritatively
extrapolated from the Word of God.
You are correct in asserting that
not everything a pope writes in an
encyclical is infallible, but, more
narrowly, when the Magisterium (the
pope [and/or] a bishop in union with
him) teaches on a matter of faith
or morals, that is, a universal teaching
of the Church, not just a local
discipline or custom, he is speaking
infallible truths.
These infallible truths are summarized
in the Catechism, which:
- include all the
Church's teachings on sexuality,
and
- can grow through time, but never
change.
For example, in-vitro fertilization
did not exist before the 1970's,
but the Church may apply her principle
that sexual love can never separate
its unitive and procreative dimensions
without it being a sin of selfishness.
Hence in-vitro fertilization is wrong.
Peace,
Paul
|
Martin
replied:
Gentlemen (and Gentlewoman):
I wish to thank all of you for your
strong encouragement to me in tackling
my problem.
Your thorough responses are far more
than I had expected.
You have meritoriously evidenced
your knowledge of Catholicism and
fitted it to my needs.
I might quibble further with Paul
on the conditions for infallibility,
but that's not my aim.
My aim, at this point, is to thank
you sincerely for your time and effort
in responding to me. I very much
appreciate Eric's advice to Take
courage and don't be afraid — God
is with you.
Well, that's just what I've
decided to do, thanks again to all
of you.
Bless you!
Yours in Christ,
Martin
|
|
|
|