|
 |
Karen
wrote:
|
Hi, guys —
My husband's step-mom is a non-denominational
Christian who recently made a comment on Face
book that she would like to see her
grandchildren baptized and saved.
I reminded her that she was at my daughter's
Baptism two years ago and my other daughter
had also been baptized; both my daughters
and I are Catholic. She responded back:
So true, but I want to see them saved
too!
- In your opinion, do you think this warrants
a response?
Karen
|
{
How
do I explain our view of being saved and justified to my non-denominational
mother-in-law? }
|
John
replied:
Hi, Karen —
This is a great question and a great
opportunity for you to share with
your Mother-in-law what the Church
teaches. Obviously, you want both
your daughters to be saved. As Catholics,
we believe that we are saved by God's
grace and mercy so we rely and trust
on the love and mercy of Jesus to
save us. Although we are objectively saved or
rather justified in Baptism, there
is a progression. We must own our
faith so you tell your Mother-in-law,
that you intend to:
- teach your daughters what Jesus
did for them
- share with them how He loves
them more than anyone else, and
- encourage them to:
- believe in
Him
- pray to Him, and
- have a relationship
with Him.
These are all things which are Catholic
truths, that our Christian brothers
embrace but, because Catholics don't
use their language, they figure
we don't believe it. Sadly,
sometimes, we don't believe it.
Sometimes we get sacramentalized but
we don't get evangelized.
People teach us about Jesus but they
don't introduce us to Him. Start
by assuring your mother-in-law that
you will share the Gospel with both
your daughters.
Then, if you feel competent, you
can begin to talk to her about the
way Catholics understand salvation.
To prepare yourself, I suggest you
visit our data base and go over the many
questions and answers on the subject
of salvation, justification, redemption,
and so forth.
If you are having difficulty understanding
a particular teaching, please feel
free to write us again for more help.
I hope this helps,
John DiMascio
|
Karen
replied:
Hi, John —
Her comments really upset me because
she was talking about my children.
I know she believes that you need
to accept Jesus as Lord and Savior
in order to be saved and probably
in a
once saved, always saved theology,
but it made me wonder where she thought
my children
(ages two and five) would end up
if, God forbid, they died today.
- Being a former pastor, do you
know what Protestants believe
about that?
I have gone to Catholic school my
whole life and never really heard
the term justification as it relates
to Christianity and salvation. I
have read
about it on this web site, though
it is still a little unclear. I think
I need to familiarize myself with
the faith a bit more before speaking
to her on the subject.
Thanks for your help.
Karen
|
John
replied:
Karen —
Protestant beliefs vary, but most
of them would say children who have
not attained the age of reason are
saved. There are 30,000 denominations
in the United States alone as of
1998, so it's pretty much up for
grabs.
We can talk further about justification.
It is a primary a Christian doctrine,
especially for Protestants. I would
start familiarizing yourself with the book of Romans. Bear in mind,
Martin Luther and John Calvin, the
Fathers of the Protestant Reformation,
completely misunderstood what Paul
was saying here. That's where they got
the idea of once saved, always
saved,
if truly saved at all. That's also
where they got the idea of faith
alone. Although Romans doesn't
say faith
alone, it says, faith
apart from works of the law. That's
where they got the idea that salvation
is this one-time static event. A
superficial read of Romans can give
that idea, but one needs to understand
the text, in context. Nevertheless,
that's the best place to start.
I would also get the Catechism of the Catholic Church, If
you don't have one. Obviously,
you need a Bible, if you don't
have one. I recommend the Revised Standard Version - Catholic Edition, not
to be confused with the New Revised
Standard. It's put out by
Ignatius Press.
Put briefly, Justification is the
doctrine that gets into the mechanics
of:
- How we are saved
- What it means to be saved, and
- What Christ accomplished for
us on the Cross.
Protestants believe it is a static,
forensic event; more like a simple
legal status. By accepting Christ,
we are legally justified. Christ
declares us not guilty based
on His Sacrifice and He imputes His
righteousness to us. Thus, as Luther
said:
We are like a pile of dung that
is covered with snow.
The Church says, Yes, we are declared
righteous by faith but that's where
it starts; actually,
it starts with grace. That's
why we can baptize infants. The Church
has the faith and, as God's emissary, She bestows the grace of justification
on us at Baptism so we are declared
righteous but God does what He decrees,
so in declaring us righteous, he
makes us righteous. That said, we
start out as a pile of dung, and
God first covers us with snow then
turns us into snow.
Now that righteousness is infused,
not just imputed.
That means it's real and it must
manifest itself in our lives. Therefore,
justification is dynamic; it's active,
and it grows. As we do good
works in faith, we grow in our justification.
We also grow in our sanctification
as we overcome sin.
Protestants, therefore, are under
the misunderstanding that we believe
we are working for our salvation; this isn't true. We are cooperating
with grace; it is Christ at work in
us.
But again, you should get a Catechism of the Catholic Church, a Bible and
familiarize yourself with the faith.
I apologize for the fact that, in
all your years in Catholic school,
these fundamentals of the faith were
never explained. This is a huge indictment
of the way the Church transmits the
truths she professes. Unfortunately,
it's almost an epidemic of ignorance.
Because we neither evangelize or
catechize the baptized properly,
we lose people who are hungry, to
the first Protestant that shows up
with a Bible.
I hope this helps and by all means,
stay in touch!
Under His Mercy,
John DiMascio
|
Karen
replied:
Hi, John —
I have been reading and studying.
I bought and have been reading the Catechism and several books by Scott Hahn. Of course, I have been reading
my Bible as well.
As a very interesting side story,
I decided to share all that I had
been learning with a very good ex-catholic friend
of mine. This same friend invited
me to her church's Bible study a
few years ago which I went to, then
decided to stop going to about a
year ago. I wanted to explain to
her why
I stopped going. After a few hours
of talking, to my surprise, she asked
if she could read the
book I had been talking to her about,
Scott Hahn's Rome
Sweet Home.
That was two months
ago. We have been getting together
now every Tuesday, after our kid's
gymnastics, to study. She is meeting
with our parish priest to discuss
coming back to the Church as well
as getting her three children baptized.
So, to all of you at AskACatholic,
thank you! God is definitely using
this web site for wonderful things.
And now for my question. Your above
response was really clear and helpful
on the Catholic view of justification.
- Now I am wondering, how sanctification
is different?
Our justification process starts
at Baptism but it progresses and
grows as it manifests in our lives.
We are becoming the very snow that
God first covered us with, as we
do good works with faith and love
and, of course, that is only because
God gave us the grace to do so.
- Do I have that right?
- If so, how is this different
from sanctification?
Thanks!
Karen
|
John
replied:
Karen —
Justification and sanctification
are inextricably linked together.
I choose to look it at like this:
Sanctification is the process through
which we rid ourselves of vices and
increase virtues in our soul; this
process of ongoing growth by grace
continues to justify us by grace.
Justification and sanctification
also differ in a couple other ways as well.
Justification brings news life when
someone is spiritually dead. So if
someone hasn't been baptized yet,
they are justified by the grace of
the sacrament of Baptism. If they
don't know or understand the need
for Baptism, but receive Christ as
Lord and Savior, then we can assume
they have received a Baptism of desire.
Also, if someone loses their justification
through mortal sin, they can regain
it through:
- the sacrament of Confession
or
- a perfect contrition and
repentance.
Again, all of these actions are a
work of Grace.
As for sanctification, I wrote that
it is a process through which we
rid ourselves of vice and increase
virtue in our soul. Let me be really
clear. That is also a work of the
Holy Spirit.
The phrase rid ourselves may
suggest it is our own work. While
I'm pretty sure you understood what
I mean, if you talk to your friend,
you don't want her to think we believe
in a gospel of works.
God Bless,
John
|
Karen
replied:
Hi, John —
Thank you. Yes, this helps a lot.
One last question, you said:
Also, if someone loses their justification
through mortal sin, they can regain
it through:
- the sacrament of Confession
or
- a perfect contrition and
repentance.
The leader of that Bible study I
was in said that if a person, who
accepted Jesus, led a life of what
we would call mortal sin and was
not contrite, then most likely, they
never were sincere when they accepted
Jesus and therefore never justified.
This explanation would be in line
with their belief of once saved,
always saved.
Is this how Catholics would view
it? . . . :
We would believe that had that
person been baptized either through
the sacrament of Baptism or through
its desire, they were justified,
but by turning completely
away through mortal sin, without contrition,
they would actually lose their
justification.
And that whether
they were saved at their death,
would not be for us to judge.
Sorry for the e-mails. As you can
see, I have been trying for a few
months to really understand justification.
Hopefully, this will be the last
one.
Karen
|
John
replied:
Karen,
Yes, this is because they understand
Justification as static and forensic,
rather than dynamic and intrinsic.
Baptism, justifies someone objectively.
When a baby is baptized (he|she)
is born again. (He|She) receives
the life of God, the Holy Spirit,
and the grace to overcome sin.
You see, Protestants start by asking
the question:
that's the essential question for
them. That is what all their theology
hangs from. Catholics and Orthodox
Christians have always started from
the question that Jesus asked Peter:
We let God worry about salvation.
Surely, we want to love and serve
God. We want to go to Heaven. We
want to avoid Hell, but we don't
go around saying this one is saved
and that one is not. Our theology
is contingent upon answering the
question:
- Who is Jesus?
- Not, what about me?
We are called to get our eyes off
ourselves and worship Him. As far
as salvation is concerned,
we rely
on His Mercy, Love and Justice; knowing
He desires all men to be saved.
John
|
Eric
replied:
Dear Karen,
You're quite right; they believe
that once you are saved, you can
do nothing to lose your salvation,
and that if you do something to
lose your salvation, you've proven
that you weren't saved in the first
place. Rather circular logic, especially
when you ask:
- Did the person who
later proves he never was saved in the first place know he was
not saved in the first place when
he first got saved?
- In other words,
if you get saved, how
can you be sure that you won't later
prove that you weren't really
saved in the first place?
- Or
how can you be sure when you get saved that
you will never, ever do anything
to prove that you weren't saved in
the first place?
- If you can't be
sure, isn't that the same as not
having assurance of salvation?
There are a few verses that address
this, especially in the book of Hebrews
which says:
"For
it is impossible for those who
were once enlightened, and have
tasted the heavenly gift, and
have become partakers of the Holy
Spirit, and have tasted the good
word of God and the powers of
the age to come, if they fall
away, to renew them again to repentance,
since they crucify again for themselves
the Son of God, and put Him to
an open shame. For the earth which
drinks in the rain that often
comes upon it, and bears herbs
useful for those by whom it is
cultivated, receives blessing
from God; but if it bears thorns
and briers, it is rejected and near to being cursed, whose end
is to be burned."
Hebrews 6:4-8 (NKJV)
So this refers
to people who have been enlightened,
have been partakers of the
Holy Spirit, and have repented,
that is, who were saved, but who fall
away in apostasy (which
implies of its very nature a previous
belief),
to be brought again to repentance,
and they will be burned.
(a symbol
of Hell) Hebrews 10:26-31 (NKJV)
says:
"For if we sin willfully
after we have received the knowledge
of the truth, there no
longer remains a sacrifice for
sins,
but a certain fearful expectation
of judgment, and fiery indignation
which will devour the adversaries.
Anyone who has rejected Mose's
law dies without mercy on the
testimony of two or three witnesses.
Of how much worse punishment,
do you suppose, will he be thought
worthy who has trampled the Son
of God underfoot, counted the
blood of the covenant by which
he was sanctified a common thing,
and insulted the Spirit of grace?
For we know Him who said, 'Vengeance
is Mine, I will repay,' says
the Lord. And again, 'The Lord
will judge His people.' It is a fearful thing to fall into the
hands of the living God."
That first verse, 26: no
longer remains a sacrifice for
sins means someone
whose sins were previously remitted,
but who lose salvation. Hebrews
10:38 says that the righteous
(saved) one can shrink back and
be destroyed:
"But
my righteous one will live by
faith. And if he shrinks back,
I will not be pleased with him.
But we are not of those who shrink
back and are destroyed, but of
those who believe and are saved."
Hebrews 3:12 says that we have to hold firmly
to the end to share in Christ:
"See
to it, brothers, that none of
you has a sinful, unbelieving
heart that turns away from the
living God. But encourage one
another daily, as long as it is
called Today, so that none of
you may be hardened by sin's deceitfulness.
We have come to share in Christ
if we hold firmly till the end
the confidence we had at first."
Other books
speak of this as well.
Paul says
we should judge nothing until the
appointed time in 1 Corinthians 4:
"So
then, men ought to regard us as
servants of Christ and as those
entrusted with the secret things
of God. Now it is required that
those who have been given a trust
must prove faithful. I care very
little if I am judged by you or
by any human court; indeed, I
do not even judge myself. My conscience
is clear, but that does not make
me innocent. It is the Lord who
judges me. Therefore judge nothing
before the appointed time; wait
until the Lord comes. He will
bring to light what is hidden
in darkness and will expose the
motives of men's hearts. At that time each will receive his praise
from God."
1 Corinthians 4:1-5
He (Paul) feared
losing his salvation:
"Do
you not know that in a race all
the runners run, but only one
gets the prize? Run in such a
way as to get the prize. Everyone
who competes in the games goes
into strict training. They do
it to get a crown that will not
last; but we do it to get a crown
that will last forever. Therefore
I do not run like a man running
aimlessly; I do not fight like
a man beating the air. No, I beat
my body and make it my slave so
that after I have preached to
others, I myself will not be disqualified
for the prize."
1 Corinthians 9:24-27
Jesus
spoke on this, too:
"I
am the vine, you are the branches.
If a man remains in me and I in
him, he will bear much fruit;
apart from me you can do nothing.
If anyone does not remain in me,
he is like a branch that is thrown
away and withers; such branches
are picked up, thrown into the
fire and burned. If you remain
in me and my words remain in you,
ask whatever you wish, and it
will be given you. This is to
my Father's glory, that you bear
much fruit, showing yourselves
to be my disciples."
John 15:5-8
"You
have heard that it was said to the
people long ago, 'Do not murder,
and anyone who murders will be subject
to judgment.' But I tell you that
anyone who is angry with his brother
will be subject to judgment. Again,
anyone who says to his brother, 'Raca,'
is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But
anyone who says, 'You fool!' will
be in danger of the fire of hell."
Matthew
5:21-22
"If your right eye causes
you to sin, gouge it out and throw
it away. It is better for you to
lose one part of your body than for
your whole body to be thrown into
hell. And if your right hand causes
you to sin, cut it off and throw
it away. It is better for you to
lose one part of your body than for
your whole body to go into hell."
Matthew
5:29-30
So these people really do not have
a Scriptural leg to stand on. This
is only a small fraction of the verses
I have on file refuting Once Saved
Always Saved.
Eric
|
|
|
|