Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
back
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History

Bern Begaso wrote:

Hi, guys —

Thank you very much for the wonderful answer on Limbo.

Let me ask a few other questions:

  • Why do Protestants keep saying that seven books of the Catholic Church are apocryphal?

I have noticed that these books, like Tobit, Sirach, and most of the seven books, are included in the Dead Sea Scrolls and have been included in the Septuagint.

  • We all agree that these oldest copies of the Bible are authentic so, if they are apocryphal, why aren't they are included?
  • Besides Maccabees 1 and 2, why don't we include Maccabees 3 and 4, seeing that they are in the Septuagint?

What do I say if someone asks:

  • Does the Catholic Church take care the original Bible? or
  • How can you be so sure that the Catholic Bible is not corrupted?

Thank-you very much!

Bern

  { Why do Protestants keep saying that seven books of the Catholic Church are apocryphal plus? }

Bob replied:

Bern,

The canon of Scripture was ratified at the Council of Trent in 1546 as to clarify what Catholics verses Protestants held as the formal canon. Prior to that, there was universal acceptance of the canon since about the fifth century when all agreements were settled through several synods and councils.

Since the Reformation, however, the Protestants had dropped books from the canon because of doctrinal conflicts with what they believed and didn't believe. For example, Luther found the idea of Purgatory incompatible with his soteriology, and therefore Maccabees, which seemed to affirm it, had to go. Likewise, the epistle of James was problematic for it contradicted his faith alone doctrine. He called James an epistle of straw and wanted to drop it but had to keep it only because the backlash was too great. So, the Church reaffirmed, once and for all, what rightfully belonged to the canon. The additional books you mentioned were only apocryphal so they didn't make it into the canon of Scripture.

In short, Protestants call the seven books you mentioned apocryphal because they created their own canon so as to reject Catholic doctrine. They had no authority to define the canon. The Church had done it already by the fifth century. There were many texts that had been in circulation and were regarded as Scripture but the Catholic Church did the work of sorting it all out and had the authority to set the canon while Protestants — a collection of sects that broke from the Church — clearly did not. The best they can offer is a fallible collection of infallible books which amounts to nothing.

With respect to the certainty of the text, we have a great deal of confidence.

Thousands of ancient copies of the varies parts of Scripture have been collated and compared as to give the best rendition of the originals — which largely have been lost.

Nevertheless, there is a greater certainty for our text than ancient copies of most secular works because of the abundance of material from which there was to derive the originals.

Peace,

Bob Kirby

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.