Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
back
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History

Tuan Trinh wrote:

Hi, guys —

I was reading the Aquinas Catechism where he is talking about the 7th commandment (Thou shall not steal), I came across the following paragraph:

The lost of spiritual goods; finally, stealing is forbidden because the results of theft are peculiarly harmful to the thief, since they lead to his loss of other goods. It is not unlike the mixture of fire and straw:"fire shall devour their tabernacles, who love to take bribes" and it ought to be known that a thief may lose not only his own soul, but also the souls of his children, since they too, are bound to make restitution.

My question is:

  • Are we really bound to make the restitution for our parent's debt?

Thank you,

Tuan

  { Citing the 7th Commandment, are we really bound to make the restitution for our parent's debt? }

Eric replied:

Tuan,

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.

This is admittedly a difficult passage.

What he may be saying is that there is an obligation to make restitution in justice, an obligation that may devolve (say, if the thief were to die before making sufficient restitution) upon his children, tempting them to ignore the obligation. It's not a matter of the children being guilty for the sin. It's a question of justice, a question of correcting the situation.

Say a thief steals something and leaves it to his children. Then his children would incur the obligation to restore the stolen goods, putting their souls in danger if they knowingly did not do so.

  • Does this help?

Eric

Tuan replied:

Hi Eric,

Thank you very much for taking your precious time to answer my question.

  • It's obvious that the children are bound to make restitution if they benefit or inherit the stolen goods but I wonder if they are still bound to make restitution in the case where they have nothing to do with the stolen goods?
Tuan

Eric replied:

Tuan,

If this is a practical question, I'd discuss it with your local priest. I am not a moral theologian, but I'd probably say that if you know restitution has not been made, and you've inherited from a guilty party, you are obliged to make restitution. But that is my guess.

Perhaps one of my colleagues can comment more competently.

Eric

Tuan replied:

Hi Eric,

Again, thank you for your time and your view of this situation.

Tuan
Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.