Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Confession
back
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History


Sarah Simpson wrote:

Hi, guys —

I have a question about what is acceptable for a Confession.

It's my understanding that Catholics have to confess the number of sins in Confession, like we lied five times, etc., but is it OK to give an average of the number of times, if we don't remember, like:

  • we had greed, one to thirty times in a month, or
  • I got angry, one to eight times a day.
  • Is this correct?
  • Also, since I have a lot of sins, Is it OK if I bring a piece of paper to Confession with my sins and read them to the priest?

Last time it took a lot of time to remember all of them! It would save a lot of time and remembering plus I noticed there were a few people in line behind me.

Sarah

  { Do I have to confess all sins and their frequency; and can I bring a piece of paper to Confession? }

Paul replied:

Dear Sarah,

Although it is a good practice to confess venial sins in Confession, you only need to number the serious sins you've committed, what the Church would call mortal sins. Since having greed or getting angry are not mortal sins in themselves, if you did not choose to seriously harm someone from your anger or greed, it would not be necessary to remember exact numbers in these instances.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with writing down your sins and taking it in to Confession with you.

Paul

Sarah replied:

Thanks Paul,

I know boys that I'm friends with that have either omitted or insufficiently confessed the sins against the beautiful virtue of purity, saying, for instance, that they had committed such sins two or three times when it was four or five.

Other boys may have fallen into that sin but, because of shame, never confessed it or did so insufficiently. Others were not truly sorry or sincere in their resolve to avoid it in the future.

There were even some who, rather than examine their conscience, spent their time trying to figure out how best to deceive their Confessor. Nevertheless, among them were some whose conduct seems to be good.

Sarah

Mike replied:

Sarah,

These postings should address most of your original question and follow-up reply:

You said in your follow-up reply:
There were even some who, rather than examine their conscience, spent their time trying to figure out how best to deceive their Confessor.

That is plain stupid! While not only being sacrilegious, deceiving the Confessor while in Confession invalidates the sacrament. Any Confession has to be done with honesty and sincerity.
Shame is a relatively small part of the penance that the penitent goes through to be healed.

This is what the Catechism tells us:

VII. The Acts of the Penitent.

1450 "Penance requires . . . the sinner to endure all things willingly, be contrite of heart, confess with the lips, and practice complete humility and fruitful satisfaction."

(Roman Catechism II,V,21; cf. Council of Trent (1551): DS 1673.)


(The Acts of the Penitent.)
.
.
1456 Confession to a priest is an essential part of the sacrament of Penance:

"All mortal sins of which penitents after a diligent self-examination are conscious must be recounted by them in Confession, even if they are most secret and have been committed against the last two precepts of the Decalogue; for these sins sometimes wound the soul more grievously and are more dangerous than those which are committed openly."

(Council of Trent (1551): DS 1680 (ND 1626); cf. Exodus 20:17; Matthew 5:28)

When Christ's faithful strive to confess all the sins that they can remember, they undoubtedly place all of them before the divine mercy for pardon. But those who fail to do so and knowingly withhold some, place nothing before the divine goodness for remission through the mediation of the priest, for if the sick person is too ashamed to show his wound to the doctor, the medicine cannot heal what it does not know.

(Council of Trent (1551): DS 1680 (ND 1626); cf. St. Jerome, In Eccl. 10,11:PL 23:1096)


Let's look at it a different way.

  • Let's say I have a sharp pain in my heart, when I go to the doctors, if I tell him I have a sharp pain in my knee, will my heart get fixed?

For each specific sin we confess, we also receive special graces not to commit that confessed sin again.

  • Why would anyone go to Confession and purposely lie or deceive the Confessor and still expect they will get spiritually healed . . . if they truly wanted it?

Your boyfriends and their parents have been poorly educated on the Sacrament of Confession.

Mike

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.